A monthly report on pesticides and related environmental issues

Animated spider

Issue No. 141, November/December 1997

Open Forum:
In an attempt to promote free and open discussion of issues, The Agrichemical and Environmental News encourages letters and articles with differing views. To include an article, contact: Dr. Catherine Daniels, Food and Environmental Quality Laboratory, 2710 University Drive, Richland, WA 99352-1671, ph: 509-372-7495, fax: 509-372-7491, E-mail: cdaniels@tricity.wsu.edu

Note: Based on instructions from WSU CAHE administration, information in this newsletter not originating from WSU contains a headline in the same color as the word "Note" at the beginning of this paragraph. This is to help ensure that readers can readily identify material obtained from a source outside WSU.

In This Issue

News and Notes 

State Issues

 Pollinating Insects, Labeling Issues in 1997

Federal Issues

 Panel Finds No Link Between Pesticide Exposure, Cancer

Tolerance Information

 PNN Update

 

 

Note: The animated spider graphic appearing at this site is used with permission. Copyright and use information may be obtained at http://www.inscot.demon.co.uk

Return to PICOL Home Page

News and Notes

Note: The AENews is accessible from the World Wide Web via http://picol.cahe.wsu.edu
Enter this address carefully, paying close attention to punctuation and spacing (no spaces between parts of the address). Some readers may experience difficulties accessing the site. These are believed to be related to the Internet and to on-line services, not the web site. If you are having a problem accessing the web page, please inform Dr. Catherine Daniels (ph: 509-372-7495, fax: 509-372-7491, E-mail: at 509-372-7495, cdaniels@tricity.wsu.edu)


NOTICES:

Unresponsive subscribers to be purged from AENews list

AENews subscribers were to complete and return by October 15 postcards stating their wish to continue receiving the newsletter. Those not responding will be purged from the mailing list. In the event of lost of misplaced postcards, please inform us. Agrichemical & Environmental News, WSU-TC, FEQL, 2710 University Drive, Richland, WA 99352-1671. Phone: 509-372-7495. Fax: 509-372-7491. E-mail: cdaniels@tricity.wsu.edu

No newsletter mailings in November or December

This edition of the Agrichemical and Environmental News is being produced only for the Internet. We anticipate a return in February to both Internet and hardcopy versions of the newsletter.

Address change

After the first of the year, the mailing address for the Food and Environmental Quality laboratory, Pesticide Information Center, and The Agrichemical and Environmental News will officially change from 100 Sprout Road to 2710 University Drive. This is only a change of mailing address; physical locations remain unchanged.


Group pushes for rotenone

The Rotenone Reregistration Coalition (RRC), composed of three smaller corporations (CCT, Webb Wright, and Dragon), actively supports reregistration of rotenone with the EPA.

Rotenone is a botanical insecticide obtained from the root of the cub‚ plant (although derris, timbo, and other plants have been utilized as sources). It is offered as a "stand alone" product, primarily used on a broad spectrum of annual and perennial crops by organic producers. State registrations are many; the exception is California, which has no active labels for a rotenone-only product for agricultural use.

The RRC supports reregistration of the following crop groups (through the representative crop) for magnitude of the residue: brassica (Brussels sprouts); cucurbits (cucumbers); stone fruit (peaches); legumes (succulent beans and legume foliage); berries (blackberries); caneberries (raspberries); edible-podded beans/peas (beans); succulent shelled beans/peas (beans); and dried, shelled peas/beans (beans and legume foliage). The following are supported for residue decline: stone fruit (apples); vegetables (tomatoes) and leafy vegetables (lettuces).

Return to Table of Contents

Pollinating insects and labeling issues in 1997

...Erik Johansen, WSDA

Erik Johansen is a pesticide registration specialist with the Washington State Department of Agriculture. He may be contacted at Phone: (360) 902-2078, Fax: (360) 902-2093, or E-mail: ejohansen@agr.wa.gov

The use of residual insecticides in tree fruits is the primary cause of bee kills investigated by the Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA). The following summarizes the bee kills investigated by the WSDA since 1992, and some precautions that may help prevent future bee kills.

Bee kills reported 1992- 1996

From 1992 to 1996, there were 114 bee kill incidents reported to the WSDA. The majority of bee kills were in central Washington (primarily in Yakima County), and approximately one-half of the incidents were caused by the use of residual insecticides on tree fruits. The three insecticides responsible for most of these incidents were carbaryl, chlorpyrifos, and methyl parathion (encapsulated).

Bee kills reported in 1997

There were eight incidents reported to the WSDA in 1997. The bee kills were all in central Washington (three in north-central counties). Some investigations are not yet complete, but the majority of bee kills in 1997 are suspected to be from insecticides used on tree fruits.

Bee kill prevention

Pesticide applicators need to follow label and rule directions. Communication between concerned parties is important. Controlling weed bloom in orchards is an essential part of preventing bee kills. WSDA is working on improving the pollinator protection statements on labels for insecticides toxic to bees (especially tree fruit insecticides).

Pollinator protection statements on insecticide labels

WSDA will require a pollinator protection statement on the Washington State Special Local Needs (SLN) label for insecticides that are toxic to bees. The department is revising tree fruit and canola insecticide labels in 1997, and will revise small fruit and seed crop insecticide labels in 1998. When appropriate, WSDA will recommend changes to pollinator protection statements on federal insecticide labels.

 

Products of Concern - Tree Fruits

Common name (formulation)

Trade name

Length of residual hazard

azinphos-methyl

Guthion

2.5 days

carbaryl (WP)

Sevin

3-7 days

chlorpyrifos

Lorsban

4-6 days

diazinon

2 days

dimethoate

Cygon

3 days

malathion (ULV)

Cythion

5.5 days

methidathion

Supracide

1-3 days

methyl parathion (encapsulated)

Penncap-M

5-8 days

phosmet

Imidan

1-4 days

 

Sources of residual hazard data:

Johansen, C.A. and D.F. Mayer. 1990. Pollinator Protection: A Bee and Pesticide Handbook.
Wicwas Press, Chesire, CT.

Mayer, D.F., C.A. Johansen and C. Baird. 1996. How to Reduce Bee Poisoning from Pesticides
(WREP 15). Cooperative Extension Service, WSU, Pullman, WA.

 

Return to Table of Contents

Panel finds no link between pesticide exposure and cancer 

This article was obtained from Jack L. Cooper, Food Industry Environmental Network. FIEN issues FIEN's Environmental Weekly 48 weekends per year by fax and by Internet E-mail. The network provides consulting services on the latest policies and regulatory and legislative developments in several areas. These include environmental protection, food safety, occupational safety, health, and related topics of interest to companies, trade associations, consulting firms, professional societies, educational institutions, government officials, and others interested in the food and agricultural industries.

An ad-hoc panel examining possible contributions of pesticide exposure to the development of human cancer has concluded that there is no definitive evidence to suggest that synthetic pesticides contribute significantly to overall cancer mortality.

The National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) had convened an ad- hoc panel on Pesticides and Cancer to examine the possible contribution of pesticide exposure, particularly in the general population, to the development of human cancer. The panel published its conclusions in a paper titled "Report of a Panel on the Relationship between Public Exposure to Pesticides and Cancer" in the November 15 issue of Cancer, the monthly journal of the American Cancer Society.

The panel focused primarily on exposure in the general population and reviewed a range of studies that addressed issues related to dietary exposure as well as incidental home and garden uses. In addition, the panel examined the regulatory framework that exists to safeguard the public from potentially carcinogenic pesticides. It also reviewed some potential benefits of pesticide use, including the availability of an abundant and low cost supply of fresh fruits and vegetables, as an important strategy in the overall mitigation of cancer risk. According to the panel's report, "The panel concluded that it was unaware of any definitive evidence to suggest that synthetic pesticides contribute significantly to overall cancer mortality. The panel also concluded that it did not believe that any increased intake of pesticide residues associated with increased intake of fruits and vegetables poses any increased risk of cancer. The panel further concluded, among other things, that tobacco use continued to be the most important preventable cause of cancer and premature mortality and, thus, is an appropriate focus for cancer control strategy."

The American Cancer Society's Public Affairs Office can be reached at (212) 382-2169. A copy of the 15-page paper may be obtained from the Food Industry Environmental Network (FIEN). To order by fax or E-mail, send your request referencing Issue Number 97-48, November 14, 1997, FIEN's Environmental Weekly to Jack Cooper, FIEN, at (301) 384-9340 or JLC@fien.com. With your request please include your name, organization, address, phone, fax, and Internet E-mail address.

There is a $15 service charge for all items ordered at one time, plus costs of mailing and charges for fax or E-mail.

Return to Table of Contents

PNN Update

The information contained here is not to be construed as a substitute for obtaining and reading product labels. Always read the label before applying a pesticide.

The Pesticide Notification Network is operated by the Washington State University Pesticide Information Center for the Washington State Commission on Pesticide Registration. The PNN system is designed to distribute pesticide registration and label change information to groups representing Washington's pesticide users. The information below (with the exception of the tolerance data) is a summary of what has been distributed on the PNN within the past month.

The Pesticide Information Center (PIC) operates the Pesticide Information Center On-Line (PICOL) web page. This provides a label database, status on registrations, and information on related issues. PICOL can be accessed on the Internet at http://picol.cahe.wsu.edu. The PIC office phone number is (509) 372-7492.


State Issues

New Registrations

Section 24(c) Cancellations

Section 24 (c) Revisions

 

Return to Table of Contents

Federal Issues

Label Changes

Supplemental Labels

    1. Directions for use of a Coulter Caddy system for second fall applications
    2. Directions for chemigation in established plantings of tree and vine crops
    3. Modified chemigation instructions
    1. Directions for the use of Lightning in combination with other postemergence herbicides for weed control in IMI-corn
    2. Directions for the use of Lightning with crop oils and methylated seed oils as adjuvants for weed control in IMI-corn
    1. Directions for the use of flumetsulam products (e.g., Broadstrike Plus, Broadstrike SF + Dual, Broadstrike + Dual, Scorpion III) before or after banded applications of Counter CR in field corn
    2. Directions for use of primisulfuron-methyl or prosulfuron containing products (e.g., Exceed) 10 days after banded applications of Counter CR in field corn at planting
    3. Directions for use of halosulfuron-methyl products (e.g., Permit) before or after banded applications of Counter CR in field corn
    4. Directions for the use of prosulfuron products (e.g., Peak) 15 days after banded applications of Counter CR in grain sorghum at planting
    5. Directions for use of nicosulfuron products (e.g., Accent) after banded applications of Counter CR in field corn
    6. Directions for use of primisulfuron-methyl products (e.g., Beacon) 7 days after banded applications of Counter CR in field corn
    1. Roundup Ultra - Recommendation for application as a preemergence treatment in renovation of grass seed production areas
    2. Roundup Ultra - Recommendation for spot spray application in grass seed production
    3. Roundup Ultra RT - Recommendation for spot spray application in grass seed production
    1. Benlate SP - for control of white mold on radish seed crops
    2. Benlate - for control white mold on radish seed crops
    3. Benlate SP - for control of powdery mildew in grapes
    4. Benlate SP - for use with Tilt for control of Septoria leaf and glume blotch in winter and spring wheat
    1. Using Basis Gold as a sequential postemergence treatment in corn following a reduced rate application of Extrazine II 4L, Extrazine II 90 DF, or atrazine
    2. Using Basis Gold for the control of large crabgrass in field corn
    3. Tank mixing Basis Gold with Accent for control of rhizome johnsongrass in field corn

 

Return to Table of Contents

 

 

Tolerance Information

The following tolerances were granted by EPA since the last report (October 1997). These data do not mean that labels have been registered for these uses. These pesticides must not be used until labels are registered with EPA or a state department of agriculture.

*Key

A = adjuvant 

FA = feed additive 

I = insecticide 

VR= vertebrate repellent

D = desiccant 

FM = fumigant 

IN = inert 

N = nematicide 

D/H = desiccant, herbicide 

G = growth regulator 

M= molluscicide

P = pheromone 

F = fungicide 

H = herbicide 

V = viricide 

R=rodenticide 

 

Chemical*

Petitioner

Tolerance (ppm)

Commodity (raw)

(I)

Tefluthrin

Zeneca Ag

0.06

corn, field and forage, pop and sweet

0.06

corn, fresh (including sweet K and corn with husk removed (CWHR)

0.06

corn, field, grain and pop

(I)

Bifenthrin

FMC

1

fat: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep

0.1

mbyp: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep

0.5

meat: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep

5

corn, fodder

2

corn, forage

0.05

corn, grain (field, seed, and pop)

0.05

eggs

10

hops, dried

1

milk, fat (reflecting 0.1 ppm in whole milk)

3

strawberries

(I)

Fipronil

Rhone Poulenc AG

0.02

corn, field, grain

0.3

corn, field, stover

0.15

corn, field, forage

0.03

eggs

0.4

fat of cattle, goat, horse and sheep

0.04

hog fat

0.02

hog liver

0.01

hog meat

0.01

hog meat byproducts (except liver)

0.1

liver of cattle, goat, horse and sheep

1.5

milk, fat (reflecting 0.05 ppm in whole milk)

0.04

meat of cattle, goat, horse and sheep

0.05

poultry fat

0.02

poultry meat

0.02

poultry meat byproducts

(I)

Deltamethrin & tralomethrin

AgrEvo

0.5

broccoli

1

lettuce, head

3

lettuce, leaf

0.05

soybeans

0.05

sunflower seed

(I)

Lambda-cyhalothrin

Zeneca

0.4

broccoli

0.4

cabbage

3

fat: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep

0.2

meat: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep

0.2

mbyp: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep

0.05

corn, grain (field and pop)

1

corn, fodder

6

corn, forage

0.15

corn, grain flour

0.05

corn, sweet (K + kwhr)

0.1

dry bulb onion

0.01

eggs

0.1

garlic

2

lettuce, head

5

milk, fat (reflecting 0.2 ppm in whole milk)

0.05

peanuts (and peanut hulls)

0.01

poultry, fat, meat, and mbyp

0.01

soybeans

0.2

sorghum, grain

1.5

sorghum, grain dust

0.2

sunflower, forage

0.5

sunflower, hulls

0.3

sunflower, oil

0.2

sunflower, seeds

0.1

tomatoes

6

tomato pomace (dry or wet)

0.05

wheat, grain

2

wheat: forage, hay, straw, grain dust

0.2

wheat, bran

10

hops, dried

(I)

Cyfluthrin

Bayer

5

alfalfa

10

alfalfa, hay

300

aspirated grain fractions

0.2

carrots

5

fat: cattle, goat, hog, horses

0.4

mbyp: cattle, goat, hog, horses

0.4

meat: cattle, goat, hog, horses

0.01

eggs

20

hops, dried

4

hops, fresh

15

milkfat (reflecting 0.5 ppm in whole milk)

0.5

peppers

0.01

poultry; fat, mbyp, meat

1

radishes

5

sorghum, fodder

2

sorghum, forage

4

sorghum, grain

5

sunflower, forage

0.02

sunflower, seed

0.2

tomato

0.5

tomato, concentrated products

5

tomato, pomace

(I)

Fenpropathrin

Valent

1

fat: cattle, goat, hog, sheep

0.1

mbyp: cattle, goat, hog, sheep

0.1

meat: cattle, goat, hog, sheep

0.05

eggs

2

milkfat (reflecting 0.08 ppm in whole milk)

20

peanut, hay

0.01

peanut, nutmeat

0.05

poultry; fat, mbyp, meat

2

strawberry

0.6

tomato

(H)

4-(2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-4-yl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carbonitrile

Ciba-Geigy

0.02

potatoes

(M)

Ferric Phosphate

W. Neudorff GmbH KG

exempt

in or on all food commodities

(I)

Methyl Salicylate

EPA

exempt

in or on food, when used in food and animal feed packaging at an application rate that does not exceed 0.2 mg per square inch of packaging material

(I)

Fluorine compounds

Cryolite Task Force

2(a)

potato

22(a)

potato, waste from processing

(F)

Pyrimethanil

AgrEvo USA

5

import tolerance on wine grapes

a =

Time limited tolerance expires 11/21/2001

 


EPA corrects tolerance

EPA established time-limited tolerances for residues of the plant regulator aminoethoxyvinylglycine in or on the food commodities apples and pears. The reference dose (RfD) was incorrectly stated as 0.0002 ppm, when it should have read 0.002 ppm.

Return to Table of Contents

Contributors to the Agrichemical and Environmental News:

Alan Schreiber, Allan Felsot, Catherine Daniels, Mark Antone, Eric Bechtel, Jane Thomas

Contributions, comments, and subscription inquiries may be directed to Dr. Catherine Daniels at the Food and Environmental Quality Laboratory, Washington State University, 2710 University Drive, Richland, WA 99352-1671, ph: 509-372-7495, fax: 509-372-7491, E-mail: cdaniels@tricity.wsu.edu


 

This page has been accessed  times since December 22, 1997.