A monthly report on pesticides and related environmental issues
Issue No. 141, November/December 1997
Open Forum:
In an attempt to promote free and open discussion of issues, The Agrichemical and Environmental News encourages letters and articles with differing views. To include an article, contact: Dr. Catherine Daniels, Food and Environmental Quality Laboratory, 2710 University Drive, Richland, WA 99352-1671, ph: 509-372-7495, fax: 509-372-7491, E-mail: cdaniels@tricity.wsu.edu
Note
: Based on instructions from WSU CAHE administration, information in this newsletter not originating from WSU contains a headline in the same color as the word "Note" at the beginning of this paragraph. This is to help ensure that readers can readily identify material obtained from a source outside WSU.
|
The animated spider graphic appearing at this site is used with permission. Copyright and use information may be obtained at http://www.inscot.demon.co.uk
Return to PICOL Home Page
Note: The AENews is accessible from the World Wide Web via http://picol.cahe.wsu.edu
Enter this address carefully, paying close attention to punctuation and spacing (no spaces between parts of the address). Some readers may experience difficulties accessing the site. These are believed to be related to the Internet and to on-line services, not the web site. If you are having a problem accessing the web page, please inform Dr. Catherine Daniels (ph: 509-372-7495, fax: 509-372-7491, E-mail: at 509-372-7495, cdaniels@tricity.wsu.edu)
Unresponsive subscribers to be purged from AENews list
AENews subscribers were to complete and return by October 15 postcards stating their wish to continue receiving the newsletter. Those not responding will be purged from the mailing list. In the event of lost of misplaced postcards, please inform us. Agrichemical & Environmental News, WSU-TC, FEQL, 2710 University Drive, Richland, WA 99352-1671. Phone: 509-372-7495. Fax: 509-372-7491. E-mail: cdaniels@tricity.wsu.edu
No newsletter mailings in November or December
This edition of the Agrichemical and Environmental News is being produced only for the Internet. We anticipate a return in February to both Internet and hardcopy versions of the newsletter.
Address change
After the first of the year, the mailing address for the Food and Environmental Quality laboratory, Pesticide Information Center, and The Agrichemical and Environmental News will officially change from 100 Sprout Road to 2710 University Drive. This is only a change of mailing address; physical locations remain unchanged.
The Rotenone Reregistration Coalition (RRC), composed of three smaller corporations (CCT, Webb Wright, and Dragon), actively supports reregistration of rotenone with the EPA.
Rotenone is a botanical insecticide obtained from the root of the cub plant (although derris, timbo, and other plants have been utilized as sources). It is offered as a "stand alone" product, primarily used on a broad spectrum of annual and perennial crops by organic producers. State registrations are many; the exception is California, which has no active labels for a rotenone-only product for agricultural use.
The RRC supports reregistration of the following crop groups (through the representative crop) for magnitude of the residue: brassica (Brussels sprouts); cucurbits (cucumbers); stone fruit (peaches); legumes (succulent beans and legume foliage); berries (blackberries); caneberries (raspberries); edible-podded beans/peas (beans); succulent shelled beans/peas (beans); and dried, shelled peas/beans (beans and legume foliage). The following are supported for residue decline: stone fruit (apples); vegetables (tomatoes) and leafy vegetables (lettuces).
Return to Table of Contents
...Erik Johansen, WSDA
Erik Johansen is a pesticide registration specialist with the Washington State Department of Agriculture. He may be contacted at Phone: (360) 902-2078, Fax: (360) 902-2093, or E-mail: ejohansen@agr.wa.gov
The use of residual insecticides in tree fruits is the primary cause of bee kills investigated by the Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA). The following summarizes the bee kills investigated by the WSDA since 1992, and some precautions that may help prevent future bee kills.
Bee kills reported 1992- 1996
From 1992 to 1996, there were 114 bee kill incidents reported to the WSDA. The majority of bee kills were in central Washington (primarily in Yakima County), and approximately one-half of the incidents were caused by the use of residual insecticides on tree fruits. The three insecticides responsible for most of these incidents were carbaryl, chlorpyrifos, and methyl parathion (encapsulated).
Bee kills reported in 1997
There were eight incidents reported to the WSDA in 1997. The bee kills were all in central Washington (three in north-central counties). Some investigations are not yet complete, but the majority of bee kills in 1997 are suspected to be from insecticides used on tree fruits.
Bee kill prevention
Pesticide applicators need to follow label and rule directions. Communication between concerned parties is important. Controlling weed bloom in orchards is an essential part of preventing bee kills. WSDA is working on improving the pollinator protection statements on labels for insecticides toxic to bees (especially tree fruit insecticides).
Pollinator protection statements on insecticide labels
WSDA will require a pollinator protection statement on the Washington State Special Local Needs (SLN) label for insecticides that are toxic to bees. The department is revising tree fruit and canola insecticide labels in 1997, and will revise small fruit and seed crop insecticide labels in 1998. When appropriate, WSDA will recommend changes to pollinator protection statements on federal insecticide labels.
Products of Concern - Tree Fruits |
||
Common name (formulation) |
Trade name |
Length of residual hazard |
azinphos-methyl |
Guthion |
2.5 days |
carbaryl (WP) |
Sevin |
3-7 days |
chlorpyrifos |
Lorsban |
4-6 days |
diazinon |
2 days |
|
dimethoate |
Cygon |
3 days |
malathion (ULV) |
Cythion |
5.5 days |
methidathion |
Supracide |
1-3 days |
methyl parathion (encapsulated) |
Penncap-M |
5-8 days |
phosmet |
Imidan |
1-4 days |
Sources of residual hazard data:
Johansen, C.A. and D.F. Mayer. 1990. Pollinator Protection: A Bee and Pesticide Handbook.
Wicwas Press, Chesire, CT.
Mayer, D.F., C.A. Johansen and C. Baird. 1996. How to Reduce Bee Poisoning from Pesticides
(WREP 15). Cooperative Extension Service, WSU, Pullman, WA.
Return to Table of Contents
This article was obtained from Jack L. Cooper, Food Industry Environmental Network. FIEN issues FIEN's Environmental Weekly 48 weekends per year by fax and by Internet E-mail. The network provides consulting services on the latest policies and regulatory and legislative developments in several areas. These include environmental protection, food safety, occupational safety, health, and related topics of interest to companies, trade associations, consulting firms, professional societies, educational institutions, government officials, and others interested in the food and agricultural industries.
An ad-hoc panel examining possible contributions of pesticide exposure to the development of human cancer has concluded that there is no definitive evidence to suggest that synthetic pesticides contribute significantly to overall cancer mortality.
The National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) had convened an ad- hoc panel on Pesticides and Cancer to examine the possible contribution of pesticide exposure, particularly in the general population, to the development of human cancer. The panel published its conclusions in a paper titled "Report of a Panel on the Relationship between Public Exposure to Pesticides and Cancer" in the November 15 issue of Cancer, the monthly journal of the American Cancer Society.
The panel focused primarily on exposure in the general population and reviewed a range of studies that addressed issues related to dietary exposure as well as incidental home and garden uses. In addition, the panel examined the regulatory framework that exists to safeguard the public from potentially carcinogenic pesticides. It also reviewed some potential benefits of pesticide use, including the availability of an abundant and low cost supply of fresh fruits and vegetables, as an important strategy in the overall mitigation of cancer risk. According to the panel's report, "The panel concluded that it was unaware of any definitive evidence to suggest that synthetic pesticides contribute significantly to overall cancer mortality. The panel also concluded that it did not believe that any increased intake of pesticide residues associated with increased intake of fruits and vegetables poses any increased risk of cancer. The panel further concluded, among other things, that tobacco use continued to be the most important preventable cause of cancer and premature mortality and, thus, is an appropriate focus for cancer control strategy."
The American Cancer Society's Public Affairs Office can be reached at (212) 382-2169. A copy of the 15-page paper may be obtained from the Food Industry Environmental Network (FIEN). To order by fax or E-mail, send your request referencing Issue Number 97-48, November 14, 1997, FIEN's Environmental Weekly to Jack Cooper, FIEN, at (301) 384-9340 or JLC@fien.com. With your request please include your name, organization, address, phone, fax, and Internet E-mail address.
There is a $15 service charge for all items ordered at one time, plus costs of mailing and charges for fax or E-mail.
Return to Table of Contents
The information contained here is not to be construed as a substitute for obtaining and reading product labels. Always read the label before applying a pesticide.
The Pesticide Notification Network is operated by the Washington State University Pesticide Information Center for the Washington State Commission on Pesticide Registration. The PNN system is designed to distribute pesticide registration and label change information to groups representing Washington's pesticide users. The information below (with the exception of the tolerance data) is a summary of what has been distributed on the PNN within the past month.
The Pesticide Information Center (PIC) operates the Pesticide Information Center On-Line (PICOL) web page. This provides a label database, status on registrations, and information on related issues. PICOL can be accessed on the Internet at http://picol.cahe.wsu.edu. The PIC office phone number is (509) 372-7492.
New Registrations
Section 24(c) Cancellations
Section 24 (c) Revisions
Return to Table of Contents
Label Changes
Supplemental Labels
Return to Table of Contents
The following tolerances were granted by EPA since the last report (October 1997). These data do not mean that labels have been registered for these uses. These pesticides must not be used until labels are registered with EPA or a state department of agriculture.
*Key
A = adjuvant |
FA = feed additive |
I = insecticide |
VR= vertebrate repellent |
D = desiccant |
FM = fumigant |
IN = inert |
N = nematicide |
D/H = desiccant, herbicide |
G = growth regulator |
M= molluscicide |
P = pheromone |
F = fungicide |
H = herbicide |
V = viricide |
R=rodenticide |
Chemical* |
Petitioner |
Tolerance (ppm) |
Commodity (raw) |
|
(I) |
Tefluthrin |
Zeneca Ag |
0.06 |
corn, field and forage, pop and sweet |
0.06 |
corn, fresh (including sweet K and corn with husk removed (CWHR) |
|||
0.06 |
corn, field, grain and pop |
|||
(I) |
Bifenthrin |
FMC |
1 |
fat: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep |
0.1 |
mbyp: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep |
|||
0.5 |
meat: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep |
|||
5 |
corn, fodder |
|||
2 |
corn, forage |
|||
0.05 |
corn, grain (field, seed, and pop) |
|||
0.05 |
eggs |
|||
10 |
hops, dried |
|||
1 |
milk, fat (reflecting 0.1 ppm in whole milk) |
|||
3 |
strawberries |
|||
(I) |
Fipronil |
Rhone Poulenc AG |
0.02 |
corn, field, grain |
0.3 |
corn, field, stover |
|||
0.15 |
corn, field, forage |
|||
0.03 |
eggs |
|||
0.4 |
fat of cattle, goat, horse and sheep |
|||
0.04 |
hog fat |
|||
0.02 |
hog liver |
|||
0.01 |
hog meat |
|||
0.01 |
hog meat byproducts (except liver) |
|||
0.1 |
liver of cattle, goat, horse and sheep |
|||
1.5 |
milk, fat (reflecting 0.05 ppm in whole milk) |
|||
0.04 |
meat of cattle, goat, horse and sheep |
|||
0.05 |
poultry fat |
|||
0.02 |
poultry meat |
|||
0.02 |
poultry meat byproducts |
|||
(I) |
Deltamethrin & tralomethrin |
AgrEvo |
0.5 |
broccoli |
1 |
lettuce, head |
|||
3 |
lettuce, leaf |
|||
0.05 |
soybeans |
|||
0.05 |
sunflower seed |
|||
(I) |
Lambda-cyhalothrin |
Zeneca |
0.4 |
broccoli |
0.4 |
cabbage |
|||
3 |
fat: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep |
|||
0.2 |
meat: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep |
|||
0.2 |
mbyp: cattle, goats, hogs, horses, sheep |
|||
0.05 |
corn, grain (field and pop) |
|||
1 |
corn, fodder |
|||
6 |
corn, forage |
|||
0.15 |
corn, grain flour |
|||
0.05 |
corn, sweet (K + kwhr) |
|||
0.1 |
dry bulb onion |
|||
0.01 |
eggs |
|||
0.1 |
garlic |
|||
2 |
lettuce, head |
|||
5 |
milk, fat (reflecting 0.2 ppm in whole milk) |
|||
0.05 |
peanuts (and peanut hulls) |
|||
0.01 |
poultry, fat, meat, and mbyp |
|||
0.01 |
soybeans |
|||
0.2 |
sorghum, grain |
|||
1.5 |
sorghum, grain dust |
|||
0.2 |
sunflower, forage |
|||
0.5 |
sunflower, hulls |
|||
0.3 |
sunflower, oil |
|||
0.2 |
sunflower, seeds |
|||
0.1 |
tomatoes |
|||
6 |
tomato pomace (dry or wet) |
|||
0.05 |
wheat, grain |
|||
2 |
wheat: forage, hay, straw, grain dust |
|||
0.2 |
wheat, bran |
|||
10 |
hops, dried |
|||
(I) |
Cyfluthrin |
Bayer |
5 |
alfalfa |
10 |
alfalfa, hay |
|||
300 |
aspirated grain fractions |
|||
0.2 |
carrots |
|||
5 |
fat: cattle, goat, hog, horses |
|||
0.4 |
mbyp: cattle, goat, hog, horses |
|||
0.4 |
meat: cattle, goat, hog, horses |
|||
0.01 |
eggs |
|||
20 |
hops, dried |
|||
4 |
hops, fresh |
|||
15 |
milkfat (reflecting 0.5 ppm in whole milk) |
|||
0.5 |
peppers |
|||
0.01 |
poultry; fat, mbyp, meat |
|||
1 |
radishes |
|||
5 |
sorghum, fodder |
|||
2 |
sorghum, forage |
|||
4 |
sorghum, grain |
|||
5 |
sunflower, forage |
|||
0.02 |
sunflower, seed |
|||
0.2 |
tomato |
|||
0.5 |
tomato, concentrated products |
|||
5 |
tomato, pomace |
|||
(I) |
Fenpropathrin |
Valent |
1 |
fat: cattle, goat, hog, sheep |
0.1 |
mbyp: cattle, goat, hog, sheep |
|||
0.1 |
meat: cattle, goat, hog, sheep |
|||
0.05 |
eggs |
|||
2 |
milkfat (reflecting 0.08 ppm in whole milk) |
|||
20 |
peanut, hay |
|||
0.01 |
peanut, nutmeat |
|||
0.05 |
poultry; fat, mbyp, meat |
|||
2 |
strawberry |
|||
0.6 |
tomato |
|||
(H) |
4-(2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-4-yl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carbonitrile |
Ciba-Geigy |
0.02 |
potatoes |
(M) |
Ferric Phosphate |
W. Neudorff GmbH KG |
exempt |
in or on all food commodities |
(I) |
Methyl Salicylate |
EPA |
exempt |
in or on food, when used in food and animal feed packaging at an application rate that does not exceed 0.2 mg per square inch of packaging material |
(I) |
Fluorine compounds |
Cryolite Task Force |
2(a) |
potato |
22(a) |
potato, waste from processing |
|||
(F) |
Pyrimethanil |
AgrEvo USA |
5 |
import tolerance on wine grapes |
a = |
Time limited tolerance expires 11/21/2001 |
EPA established time-limited tolerances for residues of the plant regulator aminoethoxyvinylglycine in or on the food commodities apples and pears. The reference dose (RfD) was incorrectly stated as 0.0002 ppm, when it should have read 0.002 ppm.
Return to Table of Contents
Contributors to the Agrichemical and Environmental News:
Alan Schreiber, Allan Felsot, Catherine Daniels, Mark Antone, Eric Bechtel, Jane Thomas
Contributions, comments, and subscription inquiries may be directed to Dr. Catherine Daniels at the Food and Environmental Quality Laboratory, Washington State University, 2710 University Drive, Richland, WA 99352-1671, ph: 509-372-7495, fax: 509-372-7491, E-mail: cdaniels@tricity.wsu.edu
This page has been accessed times since December 22, 1997.